Underwater gun
- Gippeto
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:14 am
- Location: Soon to be socialist shit hole.
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Actually, when hydro testing, air in the system is bad. Fluid pressure only.
The reason is that as mentioned, fluids do not store energy (compress) the way gases do. This means that in the event of a rupture, the pressure drops very quickly, and the energy (usually that stored by the gauge) is dissipated BEFORE it can cause harm. (like removing the flesh from your bones?)
The reason is that as mentioned, fluids do not store energy (compress) the way gases do. This means that in the event of a rupture, the pressure drops very quickly, and the energy (usually that stored by the gauge) is dissipated BEFORE it can cause harm. (like removing the flesh from your bones?)
"It could be that the purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others" – unknown
Liberalism is a mental disorder, reality is it's cure.
Liberalism is a mental disorder, reality is it's cure.
_Fnord was spot on; liquid water is nearly incompressible, and cannot be compressed to any great extent with the kind of forces we're able to exert on it. Therefore, it doesn't store very much energy at all when it's pressurised compared to a gas.
Your design is just wasting power, since it is essentially the small volume of air doing the work. None of these things ever work quite as well under water, for obvious reasons, but more power is often the solution. If possible, use the compressed air charge to drive a piston which pushes the ammo forward. It could be a bit difficult to achieve without a lathe though.
Your design is just wasting power, since it is essentially the small volume of air doing the work. None of these things ever work quite as well under water, for obvious reasons, but more power is often the solution. If possible, use the compressed air charge to drive a piston which pushes the ammo forward. It could be a bit difficult to achieve without a lathe though.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
Back on the main thread guys...spudchucker wrote:I know that someone already thought of doing this but would this make it easyer to work? it would have water in the air chamber so that water would come out of the gun instead of air that would get rid of all the water to air physics right?
I think that having water in the gun only reduces muzzle velocity since the water now also has to be pushed forward.
I think this problem was discussed in an earlier thread. What we agreed upon was that saran wrap or aluminum foil in a union at the end of the barrel would mitigate the water in barrel problem. Even if it burst before the projectile reached it, the exiting air would not allow water to enter the barrel.
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:40 am
- Location: Australia, QLD
you guys are wrong pressurising water can be presuurised look a this example , this guy has filled a pet bottle with water connected a hose to it and adding more water thus pressurising it 

- D_Hall
- Staff Sergeant 5
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:37 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Not true. Not true at all. It just requires a LOT of force to compress it.benstern wrote:Liquid water is an incompressible fluid. [...] It just can not be reduced in volume.
Extreme example: You think throwing a cup of water into a Neutron Star is going to increase the volume of said star 1 cup worth?
edit: And now I see I'm a few days late on this post... Why can't I delete it?
ROCK SOLID, I don't believe you understand what you said.
Air in the bottle, plastic stretches before it breaks, therefore increasing in volume... I have done the same thing, with 20 oz bottles, and 3 liter bottles.
when there is NO air in the system, the display is less than spectacular.
Back to the main topic, as psycix stated, the water has to be pushed forward, reducing velocity.
If you look at how a spear gun is built, the projectile is like an arrow, with regard to it's length:diameter. A bullet is not going to travel very far underwater.
Air in the bottle, plastic stretches before it breaks, therefore increasing in volume... I have done the same thing, with 20 oz bottles, and 3 liter bottles.
when there is NO air in the system, the display is less than spectacular.
Back to the main topic, as psycix stated, the water has to be pushed forward, reducing velocity.
If you look at how a spear gun is built, the projectile is like an arrow, with regard to it's length:diameter. A bullet is not going to travel very far underwater.
- D_Hall
- Staff Sergeant 5
- Posts: 1924
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:37 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Depends on the design. In the past 10 or so years there've been some very impressive designs that rely on super-cavitation. True, they don't go 1,000 yards or anything, but I've seen holes made through steel plates that were 30' under water (and the gun was on a helicopter).joestue wrote:A bullet is not going to travel very far underwater.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26216
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Agreed, depends on the design.D_Hall wrote:Depends on the designjoestue wrote:A bullet is not going to travel very far underwater.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
The APS was developed as a combat diver weapon intended as a personal weapon for usage under water mainly against the enemy divers.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Agreed, depends on the design.D_Hall wrote:Depends on the designjoestue wrote:A bullet is not going to travel very far underwater.
So if you're diving for crayfish, best bring along the APS incase you have some fierce comeptition with another diver?

- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26216
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
More like *innocent underwater whistle* Just bubblin' some air, attaching this mine to the enemy ship, tra la la la... (all in underwater Russian, of course) then all of a sudden, мой бог! Imperialist Yankee divers who might have some slight misgivings about having their vessel sunk!The APS was developed as a combat diver weapon intended as a personal weapon for usage under water mainly against the enemy divers.
What are you going to do, throw crayfish at them? Especially if they're wielding one of these


hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26216
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
MrCrowley wrote:Super Secret?!![]()

Aye

hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
Just hope there's six of you and one of themWhat is known is that it will fire five shots, but after the five shots are fired, a significant delay in reloading, even slower than a revolutionary war muzzleloader. You must send the upper unit back to the factory for reloading!
