A lot of ideas for tracking ammo have been discussed but this thread is to post links for for RF transmitters and receivers that are for DIY.
While drawing a schematic for MrC; I discovered some of these links:
http://www.instructables.com/id/433-MHz ... 3/YouTube/
http://www.picaxe.orconhosting.net.nz/433RX.htm
http://www.nr6ca.org/70cmyagi.html
http://www.picaxeforum.co.uk/showthread ... -Australia
RF Tracking Ideas
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
Hmm interesting. I recognise the components from the second link, the receiver and transmitter is sold by a store in my city for $15 each I think.
Just a side note, the guy who made the one in the first two links is a Kiwi
Just a side note, the guy who made the one in the first two links is a Kiwi

- mobile chernobyl
- Corporal 3
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:53 am
- Been thanked: 7 times
Interesting thread!
I'm working with a research group at school to develop an affordable communication setup for a LEO cube satellite. We get a little more area to work with but if you scale our project down, and the ~50mile it must transmit it is a very similar scenario.
I've always thought that utilizing a small CR123A cell, or an 18650 and then having a PCB made in a fitting fashion you could fairly easily make something along the lines of communicating for our distances (3-5 miles MAX). albeit being sputnik like in it's transmission, this shouldn't be too hard. You would obviously benefit from working with a slightly larger platform than the "mini-boy" though - but where's the fun in designing the projectile around your problem? lol
Another idea would be to measure the RF Doppler shift from the transmitter (projectile) similar to a speed gun and then calculate your distance by when it's signal resumes normal transmitting frequency. If you wanted to be fancy you could even plot the speed accordingly to the Doppler shift - since you'd pretty much have to know this anyway to get the distance.
Luckily all we have to do is talk to and receive data packets from the damn cube sat
Hopefully some ideas to get the creative input flowing.

I'm working with a research group at school to develop an affordable communication setup for a LEO cube satellite. We get a little more area to work with but if you scale our project down, and the ~50mile it must transmit it is a very similar scenario.
I've always thought that utilizing a small CR123A cell, or an 18650 and then having a PCB made in a fitting fashion you could fairly easily make something along the lines of communicating for our distances (3-5 miles MAX). albeit being sputnik like in it's transmission, this shouldn't be too hard. You would obviously benefit from working with a slightly larger platform than the "mini-boy" though - but where's the fun in designing the projectile around your problem? lol
Another idea would be to measure the RF Doppler shift from the transmitter (projectile) similar to a speed gun and then calculate your distance by when it's signal resumes normal transmitting frequency. If you wanted to be fancy you could even plot the speed accordingly to the Doppler shift - since you'd pretty much have to know this anyway to get the distance.
Luckily all we have to do is talk to and receive data packets from the damn cube sat

I picked these links due to the close proximty of your location.MrCrowley wrote:Hmm interesting. I recognise the components from the second link, the receiver and transmitter is sold by a store in my city for $15 each I think.
Just a side note, the guy who made the one in the first two links is a Kiwi
It is not just a coincidence.
I will post the preliminary schematics later.
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
FYI, Narrowband has better distance than wideband. A narrow band receiver lets the signal in while keeping the noise out resulting in high sensitivity to weak signals. A sensitive receiver is a must for low power location. A frequency stable transmitter and receiver is needed to keep the signal inside the receiver bandwidth. A high gain directional antenna on the receiver is good to have. A narrow band Yagi antenna cut to the frequency of operation can provide some good range.