I have been thinking about this, because I find it really interesting. I have a couple questions:
1. Would I be correct to assume that the wire can be quite thin as long as it does not break?
2. Does it need to be well grounded at the bottom end? If not does it need to even touch the ground?
What I am thinking is that the wire could possibly all be carried in the projectile and payed out as it goes up. If desired a little parachute could even be deployed at the desired altitude to keep the wire there for a while (the projectile could continue on its own). If the wire was not in contact with the ground it would drift down as the chute dropped.
[center]My wife upon seeing my latest hybrid and hearing an explanation of it:
"That really isn't a potato cannon anymore, is it?"[/center]
Try a high pressure bbmg ( or rather multiple packed snugly together) and launch coppercoated bb's straight up.
Using multiple bbmg's makes for a denser stream of bb's.
And then watch lightning jump the gaps.
It should follow the path of least resistance right?
As I said...it's just a thought...
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Try a high pressure bbmg ( or rather multiple packed snugly together) and launch coppercoated bb's straight up.
Using multiple bbmg's makes for a denser stream of bb's.
And then watch lightning jump the gaps.
It should follow the path of least resistance right?
As I said...it's just a thought...
The only problem with that is it has to be a connected leed to the grounding point or the break creates a arc pop and the pressure would spread the BB's and lose the ground stopping the lightening. I don't know what the real name for the "arc pop" is, but it sure will split welding wire in half if it gets oxidized. I've had to pull it out of my whip with plyers because the welder won't push it through the whip, what a PITA that is...
How about launching two wires at different heights?
One above the other, both with half the required length of wire?
Just one gap to jump..
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
doubt it, there needs to be a connection to start...
Oh well..
Thanks for en-lightning me..
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
balloons don't work, sadly...It needs to be a rapidly rising projectile. I had that thought before though!
Also, the bb idea is great. I'm not sure how it would work in practice though....It'd be amazing to see!
Here's a surface-level overview "guest lecture" that I feel does a good job of explaining basic lightning triggering. I have a few other peer-reviewed research papers that I've found online, but I like this one a lot:
I remember reading that article a year or two ago and getting very intrigued - enough so to the point that I was seriously considering purchasing the conductive wire for the experiment.
If you live in an area with predictable storms I say go for it, just be safe of course - it's @#$%ing lightning after all haha. The rocket launch method really seems like the way to go - much gentler acceleration curve which, given the laying wire's inertia, would be more reliable and present less of a chance of wire breakage.
KurlyQ wrote:Also, the bb idea is great. I'm not sure how it would work in practice though....It'd be amazing to see!
You would need a large HPA cylinder, and one heck of a lot of BBs. Making the launcher would be feasible though not on a small budget, especially if 0.177" is insufficient and you need a larger caliber to reach the range you need.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life