Large Valve small chamber
If valves were to have 100% effenicy, both valves would preform the same and the larger 2" valve would be a waste. Although valves are a lot lower on any terms of effeincy. So essentially the higher flow compensates for the lack in effeincy. Catch my drift? Hopefully that made sense.
- frankrede
- Sergeant Major 2
- Posts: 3220
- Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:47 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Ok thanks.
So it would have better performance. I wasn't sure because i though that the air going to the large valve then going to the small barrle might mess something up.
So it would have better performance. I wasn't sure because i though that the air going to the large valve then going to the small barrle might mess something up.
Current project: Afghanistan deployment
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
You *probably* won't notice any benefit to using a 2" valve instead of a 1.5" valve; a 1.5" valve is already providing as much flow as the 1" pipe can handle. (or pretty close, anyways)