Dual valves
-
Shadowscion
- Private 3
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:21 pm
When using two valves linked to one exhaust, is it better to have two separate chambers or should they be connected? I am building a fairly large cannon soon with dual valves and I think I should research somethings before buying parts
-
MisterSteve124
- Corporal 3
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:11 pm
- Location: West Chester, PA
- Contact:
have them connected. You could just do this with a peice of hose or something else. Well I guess it may not matter if theyre seperate or not but it would be easier to fill and its not that hard to do.
-
Shadowscion
- Private 3
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:21 pm
So have a length of hose at the end connecting the two together?
yer i'd go with as much air as you can hold so go with 2 chambers.
-
spudthug
- Corporal 5
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:02 pm
- Location: johnsonburg, Pa USA
- Contact:
yea look at this gun 
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/dual-3- ... t4650.html
jsut do something like that
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/dual-3- ... t4650.html
jsut do something like that
4" piston valved cannon-half done..( i spilt my cement...)
Hybrid- 75% done. need to build propane holder and drill/tap sparkplug hole..
Hybrid- 75% done. need to build propane holder and drill/tap sparkplug hole..
-
Shadowscion
- Private 3
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:21 pm
Would two 24"long 3" chambers flowing into two 1" valves restrict airflow a lot?
-
Shadowscion
- Private 3
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:21 pm
A multitude of sizes, mainly a golfball barrel and probably a 2" barrel also.
ya should try and make a piston man you will be happy with the results compared to a sprinkler
-
Shadowscion
- Private 3
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:21 pm
I have the valves already piston is a no-go for this project.
-
Shadowscion
- Private 3
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:21 pm
Can't really do that, these valves were purchased ages ago. Anyways back to my question please.
PS: Made this 3d of what we(my dad and I) plan on building.
PS: Made this 3d of what we(my dad and I) plan on building.
- Attachments
-
-
better yet use those valves as pilots for a DUAL PISTON gun that would be insane i don't think it even been done before 
-
jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26216
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
If I could make a reccomendation...
- Attachments
-
- save yourself some pilot volume and get better efficiency ;)
- improved.JPG (11.86 KiB) Viewed 3709 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
-
Shadowscion
- Private 3
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:21 pm
Anyways...
Which of these configurations would yield the best results?
Attached is the ggdt sheet for the gun we want to build. I tried it with both 3" and 2" chambers, the 3" yielded only 8~fps and 1ms more than the 2" chamber for some reason, so I think we will go with the 2" chamber. The projectile used was a golf ball. This sheet more than tripled the fps of my current golf ball cannon(what does that say about it -.-) and I am already amazed with the one I have.
I don't know how accurate this is though as I don't know the CV of my valves.
Which of these configurations would yield the best results?
Attached is the ggdt sheet for the gun we want to build. I tried it with both 3" and 2" chambers, the 3" yielded only 8~fps and 1ms more than the 2" chamber for some reason, so I think we will go with the 2" chamber. The projectile used was a golf ball. This sheet more than tripled the fps of my current golf ball cannon(what does that say about it -.-) and I am already amazed with the one I have.
I don't know how accurate this is though as I don't know the CV of my valves.
- Attachments
-
- GGDT.PNG (27.84 KiB) Viewed 3686 times