More distance

A place for general potato gun questions and discussions.
User avatar
Mattmp36
Private
Private
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:14 am
Location: Acworth, GA

Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:49 am

Hows it goin? I'm new to the potato cannon world and I love it! I wanted some more distance with my gun. I was able to fire a potato 540 feet. I saw a kid fire one 740 feet. How can I get more distance? I have a PVC cannon: 4"diameter combustion chamber, 18"long and a 2"diameter barrel, 44"long. I have to wear ear plugs when using it! At night, it shoots out a foot of fire! I love that thing! I want more distance with my potato though. Should I make it a 1.5" barrel instead of the 2"? What could do? Thanks.
-Matt
User avatar
lukemc
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:48 am
Location: NY

Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:57 am

add a computer fan in the chamber it significantly increases performance because it mixes the fuel. also if you have the suppplys / money build a propane meter and that will also significantly increase your distance
"Those who are different change the world. Those who are the same keep it that way"
SpudBlaster15
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Seychelles
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:13 pm

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kenny_McCormic
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:59 pm

Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:39 pm

what fuel are you using?
if yopur cannon is all pressure rated then try some starting fluid
User avatar
Mattmp36
Private
Private
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:14 am
Location: Acworth, GA

Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:40 pm

That sounds cool, except the 10 foot barrel. I would like to keep the barrel the same length as the one I have now, just a smaller diameter, so how small would I need to make the combustion chamber?

Merged:
Kenny_McCormic wrote:what fuel are you using?
if yopur cannon is all pressure rated then try some starting fluid
I'm using Oust Airsanitizer. I know it sounds funny, but that is the only thing so far I have found to work very well.
-Matt
SpudBlaster15
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Seychelles
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:12 pm

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Modderxtrordanare
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Texas

Donating Members

Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:28 pm

If I did my math correctly, then your gun as it stands has a 1.6:1 C:B ratio.

If you cut your chamber down to 12" that should increase your preformance. Also, as it's been suggested, try building a metered propane system, that'll help you alot.

(I don't know if I did my C:B ratios right, since I'm more of a pneumatic person)
User avatar
rednecktatertosser
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 7:52 pm

Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:11 pm

I believe the ideal C:B ratio is around .7:1 so if you shorten your chamber to 7 or 8 inches you should be right on the money and you should see a boost in perfomance

and modder, yes your calculations were correct he is currently at a 1.6:1 ratio, which is huge.

also if you shorten your chamber you should notice that it wont be as noisy.
SpudBlaster15
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Seychelles
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:46 pm

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rednecktatertosser
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 7:52 pm

Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:48 pm

I thougt that if he changed it to the 'ideal' C:B ratio it would increse performance.
SpudBlaster15
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Seychelles
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:10 pm

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rednecktatertosser
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 7:52 pm

Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:13 pm

Ok, well I was passing along info I have read here and on spudtech, I assumed it was correct and havent really done anything with combustions personally, so i dont really know for sure.
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major 2
Sergeant Major 2
United States of America
Posts: 3206
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Sun Jun 17, 2007 4:33 pm

SpudBlaster15 wrote:That is only the case is the chamber is oversize by a considerable degree. Research has not been done to establish the exact ratio at which this occurs in a conventional cannon.
Spudbalster's second sentence is correct, nobody has ever measured (TIKO) variable chamber on a constant barrel.

My combustion model suggests that C:B ratios in the range of 0.6 to about 1 are all essentially equivalent on a constant barrel. (Similar to Latke's results with constant chamber; relatively little difference in the range of about 0.6 to 1.0.) "Essentially equivalent" means the muzzle velocity changes by less than ~5% over that CB range.

At a C:B of 1.5:1 the muzzle velocity drops by ~10%.
At a C:B of 3.0:1 the muzzle velocity drops by ~30%.

So, by my model, on my standard gun, up to a ratio of about 1.5 there is minimal difference (though 1.0 is better than 1.5). Above 1.5 the performance starts to drop off pretty quickly.
<hr>
Back to Mattmp36 post. A chamber fan is probably the easiest way to get the maximum performance out of a particular combustion gun.

A fuel meter would be second most important. (A syringe is a cheap way to measure fuel, less than $2 total cost, and is at least as accurate as a much more expensive meter setup.)

The actual fuel makes relatively little difference as long as you are using the correct amount and are mixing it well.

A double bevel spud cutter might give you a little more range.
Image
User avatar
boilingleadbath
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
Posts: 1635
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:46 pm

Your chamber is what many would consider oversize, and the flame emerging from your barrel suggests:
1) an overly rich fuel mix (get a metering system)
2) incomplete combustion (get chamber fan and/or multiple ignition points)

#2 will help alot; latke noted much benefit from a chamber fan, and multiple ignition points will almost certainly help (especially with an oversized chamber).
***********

As a quip for contention:

"there are no oversized chambers - only poor ignitions."
Even with the slow combustion model.
User avatar
roughboy
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:43 am

Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:30 pm

Or build a pneumatic cannon coz it's more more powerful and not as loud as a combustion.
Post Reply