USG was asked to build a cannon to chuck 2 x 4's 200mph this past Tuesday for National Geographic channel show being filmed today (Saturday). The show is called Rocketville Science and the episode relates to wind driven (tornado) debris. Even with what seemed to be a ridiculous time frame we accepted the task and this what we overnighted (UPS bill was crazy) Thursday (8:30am HST) for Friday delivery. We actually only shipped the valve, pilot and some brackets. The valve by itself weighed a touch over 110lbs!
According to HGGT it predicts a 13.5lb 2X4x10' with working pressure of 125psi to exit at 292fps. Max trajectory shows 2200+ ft?
Specs:
6" schedule 80 Tee housing
5.75" piston diameter
5" sealing diameter
piloted with modified 2" sprinkler valve
Chamber is 10' of schedule 80 6"
Barrel is 20' of schedule 40 4"
3/4" steel end plates (sand blasted and parkerized) secured with 5/8" threaded rod.
The photos here represent a shortened version of the above to verify it working. We did clock a softball at 711mph with a 10 barrel while the cannon dragged itself, the steel sawhorse and operator back 24". First time I really felt the need to wear a cup and welding helmet while firing.
Sadly no video, and few photos. This was 40 hour build in 2 days, 10 pots of coffee, and a couple of angry CNC lathe / mills. Thanks USGF.
USGF has photos of the piston.
2 x 4 cannon
- Attachments
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 582 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
I'm sure national geographic will eventually obligejagerbond wrote: Sadly no video, and few photos.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
we sent uhmw pucks .01 smaller than bore diameter for attaching to the 2x4.[/GVideo]
- Technician1002
- Captain

- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
That is good size for PVC. I hope it holds up OK. I would have guessed they would have used one of Martin Engineering's solutions. Nice job landing the project.
http://www.martin-eng.com/node/425
This is larger than Martin's valves which have a 4 inch discharge.
http://www.martin-eng.com/node/425
This is larger than Martin's valves which have a 4 inch discharge.
Last edited by Technician1002 on Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 582 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Nice... did they specify a pneumatic or is there another reason you didn't send over one of your stock combustions with a larger barrel?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Technician1002
- Captain

- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
May I ask what is used for the bumper? This will need to be up to the task at hand.
Gents,
Here is the picture of the (caffeine) crazed builder with the piston in question.
USGF
Here is the picture of the (caffeine) crazed builder with the piston in question.
USGF
Last edited by USGF on Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 582 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
LOL @ Mike + caffeine!
Yes, I definitely hope you have your bumper sorted out!
Yes, I definitely hope you have your bumper sorted out!
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Bumper is 1" open cell foam and has worked before in other builds. The rear part is 2" UHMW and should take some abuse. Shooting commenced today, no phone calls from the production crew as of yet.
Tech - the schedule 80 is rated to 280psi working pressure. Most of the failures I've experience occur at the joints. The steel plates and threaded rod should keep the 2 tons of force contained well.
JSR - we decided to go the pneumatic route so they could have greater flexibilty and smaller size. Combustion cannon required to make that speed would be bigger. Also, they wanted to use a common air compressor for fill.
Tech - the schedule 80 is rated to 280psi working pressure. Most of the failures I've experience occur at the joints. The steel plates and threaded rod should keep the 2 tons of force contained well.
JSR - we decided to go the pneumatic route so they could have greater flexibilty and smaller size. Combustion cannon required to make that speed would be bigger. Also, they wanted to use a common air compressor for fill.
- Technician1002
- Captain

- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
Thanks for the info and the great piston photo. That is a nice close ratio piston (OD to seat ratio is near 1:1). That should pop open with a real bang.
I forgot to add 16,000+ ft*lbs of energy!jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:I'm sure national geographic will eventually obligejagerbond wrote: Sadly no video, and few photos.a 2x4 at any velocity is a formidable projectile, this should be a sight to behold! Are they going to use a rectangual cs barrel or a round one with a sabot?
-
PVC Arsenal 17
- Staff Sergeant 3

- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
Wow... I'm impressed by my own cannon which uses the same sprinkler valve as its main valve... yours is piloted by one. I can't imagine what it's like to watch that thing fire.
- Technician1002
- Captain

- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
About the max energy my 2 inch valve will do is about 1800. Wow that is almost a full order of magnitude larger. Nice job. No wonder the launch had such a large recoil.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 582 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
No phone calls - either they're extremely happy with it and have forgotten to call in their enthusiasm, or most of the production crew have been impaled by a freak 2 x 4 skewer 
Also, it's amazing to have a business that is the first one someone calls when they need to fire a plank of wood with more muzzle energy than an anti material rifle. I'm clearly not living my dreams, but I'm working on it
That's well over what even the heaviest loading of 0.50 BMG can generate, impressive! Though somehow I don't see this replacing the Barrett on the modern battlefield....jagerbond wrote:I forgot to add 16,000+ ft*lbs of energy!
Also, it's amazing to have a business that is the first one someone calls when they need to fire a plank of wood with more muzzle energy than an anti material rifle. I'm clearly not living my dreams, but I'm working on it
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 37 Replies
- 14700 Views
-
Last post by glass_05
-
- 11 Replies
- 15501 Views
-
Last post by wyz2285
-
- 7 Replies
- 3165 Views
-
Last post by SpudBlaster15
-
- 28 Replies
- 22605 Views
-
Last post by Benjg555
-
- 11 Replies
- 14869 Views
-
Last post by harika





